Can an assertion be a conclusion?

Can an assertion be a conclusion?

An argument is a statement that includes both a conclusion and premises. It is a factual or opinionated remark based on evidence. Remember that not all statements are arguments, and some statements may have several arguments. For example, "I like apples" can be argued using "because," "no," and "apples."

Arguments can be formal or informal. Informal arguments consist of a speaker's assertions, explanations, interpretations, etc., as support for a conclusion. They do not follow a strict structure but can be very persuasive. For example, when arguing with someone who believes that music is useless, you could say, "But what good is music if you cannot enjoy it?" The speaker is then making an argument by using examples to prove that his/her point of view is wrong.

Formal arguments are expressed in writing and include three basic parts: title, abstract, and body. The title gives the reader a clear understanding of the content of the article, and it also serves as a guide for revision. The abstract is a brief summary that captures the main ideas of the article. The body describes in detail how and why the author reached the conclusion stated in the title. This part often uses examples from real life situations to make his/her point.

What is the difference between a premise and a conclusion?

In an argument, a premise is a statement that offers justification or support for the conclusion. A single argument can have one or more premises. In an argument, a conclusion is a statement that shows what the arguer is attempting to persuade the reader or listener of. There may be many conclusions in an argument.

A conclusion is always affirmative; it must be something like "arguments for" or "cases for" or "examples of" some kind of action or behavior. A conclusion cannot simply state a fact because facts are already stated in the evidence or body of information used by the arguer to support their claim or assertion.

All conclusions should answer the question "who, what, when, where, why, and how?" "Who" is the subject of the sentence, which is usually someone's name. "What" is the main word in the sentence, which tells readers what type of document this is (i.e., a conclusion). "When" is the time period in which the event mentioned in the conclusion occurred. "Where" is the location mentioned in the conclusion. "Why" is the reason why the person or thing mentioned in the conclusion did what they did. "How" is the method or technique used by the arguer to come up with the solution for their problem.

These six questions are examples only; you can make your own conclusion relevant to the information given.

What is the argument's conclusion?

A conclusion in reasoning is the assertion that follows logically from the major and minor premises of a syllogism. When the premises are true (or credible) and the premises support the conclusion, an argument is deemed successful (or valid). The conclusion must be true or believable; otherwise, the argument would not be successful.

Every argument has a conclusion. Even if you are arguing for something that everyone agrees with, such as "Christmas trees are fun," you still need to say something. And even if you are arguing against something that no one disagrees with, such as "Christmas trees are evil," you still need to say something. Saying nothing is just as effective as saying anything else, so there must be a way for you to conclude your argument.

There are two parts to every argument: a premise section and a conclusion section. The premise section states the facts or assumptions on which the argument rests. These can be questions, statements, or any other piece of information. The conclusion section states the argument's claim or statement. This could be a statement like "Christmas trees are fun" or a question like "Should I buy a house?" Either way, there must be a conclusion, since arguments don't take places names or addresses you can walk up to.

It is important to distinguish between conclusions in logic and conclusions in argumentation.

What statements or information are used to support the conclusion?

Each premise must be accepted as true before the conclusion can be reached.

Arguments are usually written in formal language and consist of two parts: a conclusioin and a list of reasons or premises upon which the conclusion is based. The conclusion states what result is being argued for, while the reasons or premises state why this result should be accepted as correct.

An argument is considered valid if, when viewed as a whole, it follows a standard pattern that has been found to be effective by many philosophers. Specifically, an argument consists of three parts: a thesis, a proposition that supports the thesis, and a conclusion that follows from the hypothesis supported by the premise. These components are not essential, but they do help clarify how much evidence is needed to justify certain claims. A strong argument will always contain all three elements; a weak argument might omit one or more.

For example, the argument "All dogs bark; therefore, some cats meow" has as its conclusion that there are cats that meow. This argument is valid because it follows the standard pattern described above.

About Article Author

Kenneth Rushing

Kenneth Rushing is an expert on psychology, self-help, and personal development. He has many years of experience in these fields, and he knows all there is to know about how the mind works, how to use it to our advantage, and how to maintain mental health when the time comes to do either of the first two things. Kenneth enjoys writing about these topics because they are of great importance to people's lives, and he feels it is his responsibility to provide them with help when they need it most.

Disclaimer

EscorpionATL.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Related posts