(PhysOrgcom)— According to a University of Manchester study that is expected to shake up the "nature versus nurture" argument, nurture may have an even bigger impact than previously assumed. The study found that genetics play a relatively small role in determining how our bodies function compared with environmental factors such as nutrition and exercise.
The researchers concluded this by looking at how different countries' populations differ in their ability to process alcohol. They found that despite many differences between them (such as average income), they all metabolize alcohol in a similar way. This means that although there are genetic differences between people from different countries, these genes are not expressed until after birth, when environmental factors come into play.
So, in conclusion, the environment plays a much more important role in shaping our lives than we thought. Although genetics do affect how our bodies function, it does not do so independently of environmental factors.
(PhysOrg.com)— According to a University of Manchester study that is expected to shake up the "nature versus nurture" argument, nurture may have an even bigger impact than previously assumed. 28th of June, 2009.
The research shows that how people respond to stress depends on their genes, but also on their environment. This means that what makes someone resilient to stress is not just one single factor, such as their genetics, but rather the interaction between their genetic make-up and their environment. Previous studies have shown that genetics play a role in determining how people react to stress, but this new research suggests that environment also plays a part.
Dr Michael Meaney is lead author on the paper which was published in Science magazine. He says: "Our results suggest that it's both nature and nurture - individual differences in genes and sensitivity to environments factors such as childhood trauma - that account for why some people cope well with life's challenges while others suffer consequences."
This article has been written by Lucy Johnstone for Physorg.com.
This has an impact on both our emotional and physical wellbeing. In the context of the nature vs. nurture argument, "nature" refers to the influence of biological or genetic predispositions on human qualities, whereas "nurture" refers to the influence of learning and other environmental factors.
If you're born with brown eyes, it's likely that you'll have brown eyes all your life. This is because eye color is determined by genetics. However what if someone tells you that you can learn how to change your eye color? This could be done by using makeup or getting surgery. Would this be possible? Yes, it is possible! People are able to change many aspects of their appearance through plastic surgery and makeup. Only by exploring different ways to enhance our looks can we find something that suits us.
There are several theories about why people seek out new and different ways to alter their appearances. One theory is called the adaptation hypothesis. This states that people choose to change their appearances because it provides them with a better chance of survival. For example, if you were born with black skin and hair, then it would be best if you stayed that way. There would be less risk of being attacked and eaten by predators. However, if you went to South Africa today, you might be tempted to change your appearance. You might get surgery to make yourself look more like a white person.
What we call pre-wiring is influenced by genetic inheritance and other biological variables. Nurture is commonly defined as the impact of external variables on an individual after conception, such as the outcome of exposure, life events, and learning. Nature is all the factors that influence growth and development before birth.
Nurture can be further divided into two categories: internal and external. Internal nurture includes factors such as age, experience, and genetics that affect an individual regardless of environmental influences. External nurture involves factors such as environment and life experiences that affect an individual but are not permanent like internal factors.
We are all born with the same genes, exposed to the same environment, yet some people grow up healthy while others do not. The differences between those who do and those who do not grow up healthy can only be attributed to their unique experiences of internal and external nurture.
Nature - everything that affects an organism as an entire unit, including its physical structure, physiological processes, behavior patterns, and all other aspects of biology - is responsible for an organism's traits. These include its appearance, physical abilities, and behavioral tendencies. An organism's environment - what it experiences directly or indirectly through other organisms or materials around it - affects how it develops.
Nurture - bringing up children so they will become healthy adults - consists of both internal and external factors.
The nature versus nurture argument concerns the extent to which specific features of behavior are the result of inherited (i.e., genetic) or acquired (i.e., taught) effects. We call post-wiring environmental influences that take place after birth.
In simple terms, it can be said that personality traits are determined by both genetics and environment. Some traits are highly influenced by genetics while others are not. For example, your eye color is largely a product of your genes, but whether you will have blue eyes or brown eyes depends on what kind of melanin is present in the irises of your eyes. Also, some people may lose their sight due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), yet they remain cheerful and upbeat despite their visual impairment.
It is also important to note that behaviors can change over time depending on our experiences. If someone loses an arm in an accident and then gets a tattoo on the remaining limb, would they still be considered sane? This could be considered an altered behavior due to environment.
Overall, nature vs. nurture is a controversial topic among scientists because there are many factors involved in determining who will develop certain traits and who won't. However, one thing remains constant - regardless of genetics or environment, everyone's personality consists of both.
Nature vs. nurture has an impact on both our mental and physical health. The debate over nature vs. nurture is often thought of as being between those who believe that biology influences behavior, which includes traits such as intelligence, and those who believe that environment alone determines behavior.
Scientists have always believed that heredity plays a role in determining individual differences in personality and ability. Studies have shown that parents' ages, education levels, economic status, cultural values, and so on all play a role in shaping their children's abilities and potentials. This is why scientists say that talent is inherited, but skill can be learned. Some people are born with the genetics required to learn certain skills quickly, while others need more time to develop them.
In addition to genes, many psychologists believe that environment also plays a role in shaping how someone responds to situations during their lives. The situation that one is raised in, such as a loving home or not, may affect how they cope with stress and deal with change. This idea is called "the nurturing hypothesis". Some studies have shown that children from loving homes tend to have better emotional development than children from less-loving homes. These studies suggest that the nurturing environment helps children grow into healthy adults.