Is stoicism the same as apathy?

Is stoicism the same as apathy?

Stoicism, in the classical meaning, is the pursuit of virtue (pursuing your social duty, moral rectitude, and kindness). Apathy is a complete rejection of this quest and its significance. It is the refusal to act or feel in response to events around you, regardless of their moral value. A person who is apathetic will often appear cold or even cruel, since they are not moved by other people's suffering.

In the modern sense, stoicism is the attitude of controlling one's emotions especially feelings of sadness, joy, fear, anxiety, or anger. This can be done by thinking positively or using techniques such as meditation or yoga. People who follow this philosophy seek out situations that will allow them to control their emotions so they do not become affected by them.

They believe that it is vital to remain calm and collected in difficult circumstances, because only then can one react appropriately and live according to reason. The ancient Greeks called this ability "sophrosyne" which means "balance" or "equilibrium".

Without striving to improve yourself or your life, without passion, without emotion, without dreams: that is stoicism.

With these goals in mind, stoicism teaches that it is best to accept what happens and not to resist it.

Does Stoicism lead to apathy?

Stoicism does not encourage indifference in the modern sense; a Stoic is not intended to be unconcerned by everything that happens. Stoicism defines "apathy" as the lack of emotions, whereas "passion" in Stoic philosophy refers to a bad feeling caused by a wrong perception of the universe. A person who is indifferent to good and evil, happiness and misery, has no passion, but only lacks emotion about these things.

The ancient Stoics used to describe a man without passions or feelings as a god or cosmic monster. Today we might say that someone who is indifferent to all forms of pleasure and pain has not been educated properly. Someone who does not care about life's issues and problems may seem like one step away from mental illness. However, an indignant human being who is also rational and conscious can distinguish what matters to him or her personally and what does not. They may even have ambitions they are willing to work for.

In conclusion, yes, Stoicism teaches us to be calm and tolerant when difficulties come our way.

Is Stoic sense apathy ethical?

Stoicism's purpose as an ethical system is to achieve freedom from passion (in the ancient sense of "anguish" or "suffering") via the pursuit of reason and "apatheia" (apathy, in its ancient sense of being objective, unemotional, and having clear judgment). In other words, to be free from suffering you have to be free from passion. Reason is then seen as the only cure for passion.

Apathy in this context does not mean indifference or lack of caring, but rather a state where you are unaffected by good or bad things that happen to you. A stonemason who has been given permission to work on a monument will feel sad when his tools are taken away from him, but he does not suffer any less than someone who has not been granted such access. He is not affected by your banning him from the site, nor does it change his situation.

It is important to understand that for the stonemason, acting against his interests would be irrational. He has no choice but to act according to the rules set by their owner, who has the power over his daily life. From the stonemason's point of view, therefore, doing what is right is impossible; he can only do what is possible.

The ancient stoics also believed that human nature is such that we always prefer what is rational.

What is stoical apathy?

In Stoic philosophy, apathy is the state of being completely devoid of the pathe, which are the emotions and passions, most notably pain, fear, desire, and pleasure....

What is short stoicism?

Stoicism is a philosophy school that originated in ancient Greece and Rome in the early third century BC. It is a life philosophy that optimizes happy feelings, decreases negative emotions, and assists individuals in honing their character qualities. The term "stoic" comes from the Greek word stós, which means "suffering." Thus, a stoic is one who endures suffering gracefully.

Short stoicism is a version of stoicism that focuses on what matters most in life: our relationships with others, especially friends and family. It is a small lifestyle that can be applied to any situation you may find yourself in. Short stoics believe that it is important to look after number one by focusing on their own needs first. They learn how to cope with failure, disappointment, and loneliness by being present to what is happening in the moment instead of wasting energy on worrying about the future or dwelling on the past.

Short stoicism was popularized in 2008 by British writer and philosopher Antony Burgum.

What is a stoic person?

The term "stoic" is widely used to describe someone who is apathetic to pain, pleasure, sadness, or joy. The contemporary definition of a "someone who represses feelings or endures patiently" was first used as a noun in 1579 and as an adjective in 1596. The word comes from the Greek storgēs (silent) and pheme (voice), meaning a person who is silent but whose voice is heard.

Stoicism was very popular in the Roman Empire, where it was adopted by many philosophers. It then spread to Europe, where it became associated with figures such as Cato the Censor, Marcus Aurelius, and Epictetus. In the 17th century, it came back into popularity with people like John Locke, Montaigne, and Descartes.

Stoics believe that we should only worry about what we can control and that venting emotions does no good and may even be harmful to our health. They also believe that accepting what happens as part of life is the best way to live it.

People today often use the word "stoic" to describe someone who keeps quiet instead of expressing their feelings. But this usage is not consistent with the original definition! A stoic is defined as a person who represses their feelings.

Why do people criticize Stoicism?

Another critique leveled about Stoicism is that, by emphasizing acceptance of external circumstances, it leads to political indifference and quietism. The founder of modern stoicism, Zeno of Citium, did in fact advocate for the expansion of the Roman empire and the conquest of territory, but this was not accepted by his followers until after his death.

Stoicism came under fire from within its own ranks when Nero accused it of causing madness. In addition, some early critics such as Plutarch and Seneca noted that many actions considered acceptable at the time were criticized by the Stoics, such as adultery, parricide, and prodigality. They also pointed out inconsistencies in their teachings, such as Chrysippus' wife being married before they met. Some later writers, such as Epictetus, tried to resolve these issues by arguing that Zeno modified his views over time or that some behaviors accepted by other philosophers were rejected by the founders of stoicism.

More recently, some have argued that modern stoicism is incompatible with science because it relies on an unverifiable assumption known as "the law of non-contradiction". This claim is incorrect because you can't prove a negative and there are examples of things which appear contradictory on the surface that are actually consistent.

About Article Author

Marilyn Hefley

Marilyn Hefley graduated from Rutgers University with a degree in psychology. She enjoys working with clients one-on-one to help them understand their own thoughts and feelings, and how they can use this knowledge to make better decisions in their lives.

Disclaimer is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to

Related posts