Is the fundamental moral principle only felt by believers? No, not at all. Because this natural rule is engraved in every man's heart, even unbelievers have an instinct to do good and avoid evil. However, they may not know why they behave as they do.
For example, an infant does not understand morality; he only acts in accordance with his instincts. An infant sees no wrong in killing or harming another human being. He doesn't understand death, loss, pain, or anything else about life that causes him discomfort. Thus, an infant lacks any motivation to change himself into a better person.
As he grows up, the child begins to understand what others think of him. He notices that some people are nice to him and others aren't. Some people help him when he needs it and other people don't. Based on this knowledge, the child develops a desire to be liked by others and to keep them from hurting him. This makes him want to act in a way that will make them like him and keep them from hurting him. This is how morals are born.
In conclusion, the fundamental moral principle is not felt by unbelievers but it is understood by everyone. This understanding causes people to want to behave in a good way so that others will want to be around them.
As a result, a basic moral principle is the universal standard upon which all other principles related to the rightness or wrongness of an action are founded. It is the origin of morality. This fundamental moral concept is shared by all men and women, regardless of ethnicity or religious beliefs. It is inherent in the essence of man. The foundational moral principle should not be confused with religious laws, which are often based on religious texts that are believed to be inspired by God but are actually human creations that may or may not reflect what God thinks is right.
There are several different theories about what this fundamental moral principle actually is. Some believe it to be the idea that all humans are equal in dignity and worth. Others think it is the belief that one must act in such a way that will make other people happy or sad. Still others claim it is the concept that one must act in accordance with one's own conscience. None of these descriptions seems completely accurate since they all overlap to some degree. However, we can say that it is the belief that one must act in such a way that will allow humanity to progress as a whole.
In conclusion, the foundational moral principle is the belief that all men are created equal and have intrinsic value as individuals. This means that there is something fundamentally wrong with ideas like slavery, racism, and discrimination of any kind. It also means that there is something morally good about helping those in need, standing up for those who cannot stand up for themselves, and fighting injustice.
In this way, God's moral nature is said to be the ultimate foundation or ground of both people's and their actions' moral goodness. People and acts are ethically excellent because they are God-like (in important ways). So much for moral values' ontological underpinning. The next question is: what is the basis of God's moral excellence? The answer is also easy: it is his very being which makes him eligible to be a source of ethical excellence.
Moral values are objective in that they are not independent from human beings. They cannot be eliminated without eliminating humanity itself. That is why Jesus said that man does not live by bread alone but by every word that comes out of the mouth of God. Moral values cannot be removed through political action either; otherwise, we would be living in an immoral society. There must be something more than just humans who are responsible for making them exist. Something outside ourselves can give us reasons to act morally or not. This something is God who created us with a moral conscience and who wants us to live according to it.
People have tried to remove moral values from religion many times before and after Christ's time. Some religions went as far as saying that evil things are good and good things are evil. This is called "moral relativism" and it means that there are no absolute standards by which anything can be judged as good or bad.
Theology of morals Faith is the infused virtue by which the intellect, by a movement of the will, assents to the supernatural truths of Revelation, not on the basis of intrinsic proof, but only on the basis of God's infallible authority in revealing. It is a moral virtue, because it directs us in our actions to avoid what is contrary to faith and to perform those acts that promote it.
Faith is also called "the substance of things hoped for," because it allows us to accept realities about which we cannot know anything else other than that they are true. For example, we can have faith that there is a god who cares for us even though we cannot see him directly. We can believe that Jesus died on the cross for our sins even though we cannot prove this with scientific evidence. We can trust that he will come back from the dead one day even though we cannot explain how this will happen.
These are all examples of things beyond our natural understanding that yet we can still believe with perfect confidence. Our faith doesn't require that we understand everything about these mysteries, but only that we believe them to be real objects of hope. They are called "real objects of hope" because we can hold out faith for them even though they may lie far beyond our reach in time or space.